Sean Hannity is always working it for Mitt Romney

Well, let’s look at the history of other presidential candidates releasing their tax returns: first how many tax returns, on average, have been released by candidates historically? Further, how many returns did one of the candidates own father say was a reasonable and honest amount to release to the American public?

Now let’s look at the history of other presidential candidates releasing their college records: first, which other presidential candidates did the opposing political party demand college records from? Also how many years of college records, on average, did those other candidates then release?

Right.

Actual Fox News screenshot:

via: dropfox


We thought of doing a caption contest for this one, but it seems Sean Hannity already beat everyone. Audio.

Bob Cesca notes “Regarding Voter ID, Hannity and the dude from Midnight Oil tried to make the case that people need an ID to rent a movie, so they should have an ID to vote. Is renting a movie a fundamental and universal right of citizenship and civic duty? Of course it’s not. Furthermore, the process of registering to vote involves identification anyway — plus there have been roughly 13 cases of voter fraud in the last ten years. 10. And also — oh screw it. Once again, I’m trying to rationalize facile, simplistic nonsense from a professional carnival barker.

Ultimately, it’s worth noting that Hannity is the second highest rated show on all of cable news. This is what cable news viewers are hearing every night. So if you think this election is over and the president will cruise to victory, you’re out of your mind.”

Charles P. Pierce outlines Willard Romney’s four-point economic plan (for a while)

The president is angry.
The president is an angry man.
The president is black.
The president is an angry black man.

“For the past week or so… Romney has become more and more convinced that he is being treated shabbily by the political process and that, at the heart of this untoward disrespect from The Help, is that… person who currently has the job for which Willard has applied. He is simply not going to stand for this sort of thing anymore, and he is going to inform that… person that there are things that simply… are… not… done.” Continue…

 
 
 

source: truth-has-a-liberal-bias

Fun fact: there are only two things that Mitt Romney considers politically “suicidal”

1) Giving the American people a look at his tax returns.

2) Giving the American people specifics about his policies.

Mitt Romney 2012: just take his word for it!

Romney tells us (trust him!) he paid 13% in taxes—thinks he deserves a cookie now

“…But I did go back and look at my taxes and over the past 10 years I never paid less than 13 percent. I think the most recent year is 13.6 or something like that. So I paid taxes every single year. Harry Reid’s charge is totally false. I’m sure waiting for Harry to put up who it was that told him what he says they told him. I don’t believe it for a minute, by the way. But every year I’ve paid at least 13 percent and if you add in addition the amount that goes to charity, why the number gets well above 20 percent.” – Mitt Romney

First of all, even if our tax code allows the definition, since when is REQUIRED TITHING to your church the same as contributing to “charity”? Particularly when the Mormon Church rakes in $7 BILLION A YEAR from “charitable contributions” (aka: required tithing) and uses part of those contributions to build shopping malls and to fund political campaigns. Also, why am I paying at least twice as much in federal taxes on my paltry income than Romney is — a guy who’s worth a quarter billion dollars? And Team Romney-Ryan want to implement more tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, so they’ll pay even less while we’ll pay even more. Does that plan sound good to you?

Some reactions to Romney’s remarks:

Ezra Klein: “To which the obvious answer is: Well, then, why won’t you prove it?

Andrew Sullivan: “Romney refusing to release his returns isn’t a sign of strength. It’s a sign of stupidity.”

The Wire creator David Simon marvels at Romney’s nerve in “declaiming proudly” that he paid at least 13% taxes every year: “Am I supposed to congratulate this man? Thank him for his good citizenship? Compliment him for being clever enough to arm himself with enough tax lawyers so that he could legally minimize his obligations? Thirteen percent. The last time I paid taxes at that rate, I believe I might still have been in college…. I can’t get over the absurdity of this moment, honestly:  Hey, I never paid less than thirteen percent.  I swear.  And no, you can’t examine my tax returns in any more detail.  But I promise you all, my fellow American citizens, I never once slipped to single digits.  I’m just not that kind of guy.”

Rod Dreher piles on: “What Simon is getting at is Romney is an extremely rich man who pays significantly less of a percentage of his income in taxes than millions of people who make far less than he does, and he still seems to think he deserves a cookie. I’m sick and tired of him and his wife whining about how people are so mean to them about their taxes.”

Robert Reich: “Since when are charitable contributions added to income taxes when judging whether someone has paid his fair share? More to the point, Romney admits to an income of over $20 million a year for the last several decades. Which makes his 13 percent — or even 20 percent — violate the principle of equal sacrifice that lies at the core of our notion of tax fairness. 

“Even Adam Smith, the 18th century guru of free-market conservatives, saw the wisdom of a graduated tax embodying the principle of equal sacrifice. “The rich should contribute to the public expense,” he wrote, “not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more in proportion.”

“Equal sacrifice means that in paying taxes people ought to feel about the same degree of pain regardless of whether they’re wealthy or poor. Logically, this means someone earning $20 million a year should pay a much larger proportion of his income in taxes than someone earning $200,000, who in turn should pay a larger proportion than someone earning $50,000.

“But Romney’s alleged 13 percent tax rate is lower than that of most middle class Americans who earn a tiny fraction of what he earns. 

“At a time when poverty is increasing, when public parks and public libraries are being closed and when public schools are shrinking their offerings and their hours, when the nation’s debt is immense, and when the 400 richest Americans have more wealth than the bottom 150 million of us put together — Romney’s 13 percent is shameful.”

TPC on Mitt Romney’s tax plan: great for the wealthy, terrible for everyone else

Think Progress reports that “the non-partisan Tax Policy Center released an analysis this month showing that, in order for to Mitt Romney to achieve all of the goals he had laid out in his tax plan, he would have to raise taxes on everyone making less than $200,000, including a $2,000 annual tax increase on middle class families.”

Romney, after first trying to paint the organization as ideologically opposed to him (despite one of the study’s authors being a former official in the George H.W. Bush administration), then took to attacking the study itself. The Romney camp complained that TPC “did not sufficiently account for the potential benefits of Mr. Romney’s separate proposals to lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent from 35 percent, reduce other business taxes and cut domestic spending deeply.” However, TPC re-ran the numbers to include these provisions, and found that they make Romney’s plan even worse for the middle class and low-income Americans:

[...] If, instead, we had included the reduction in the corporate tax rate (which would reduce revenues by $96 billion in 2015 in the absence of base-broadening), the result would have been an even larger tax cut on high-income individuals, requiring even larger cuts to tax expenditures, and correspondingly larger increases in taxes on middle- and/or lower-income taxpayers.

TPC also noted that the spending cuts Romney has in mind would likely hit middle class families the hardest. So between Romney’s plan and vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan’s budget, the GOP ticket has a pair of proposals that would raise taxes on the middle class in order to cut them for the rich.

Mitch’s plan (courtesy of Letterman)