Stephen Colbert on Journalism+ — Stepping in Doocy


Source: sandandglass


source: drunkonstevphen


Source: sandandglass

It all makes perfect sense: Anthony Weiner’s weiner

Update * * * * * *

June 6, 2011: Anthony’s Weiner: Moving On— his pics, his apology

* * * * * * * * * * * *

There’s no question that Anthony Weiner would post a racy pic on his YFrog account. What’s there to lose? And anyway, Rep. Weiner has always given off that lewd vibe, hasn’t he?

Secondly, have we ever known Andrew Breitbart, or his excellent website, to steer us wrong? Ever?

Certainly it couldn’t possibly be retaliation for Weiner’s rather popular YouTube rants against Republicans and Breitbart’s “mission.” No way.

Media giving us facts

More of this!

GOP governors say they have a recipe for recovery: Reduce healthcare aid to the poor and give tax breaks to the wealthy. (LA Times)

Because the 11-year-old looked like she was 22!!

The New York Times’ Rape-Friendly Reporting »

Mac McClelland of Mother Jones eviscerates a NYTimes story by James C. McKinley Jr, about an 11-year-old girl (ELEVEN YEARS OLD) who was gang-raped by 18 young men. Here’s an example of McKinley’s fucked up reporting / writing:

McKinley / NY Times:

[…] Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands—known as the Quarters—said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.

“Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?” said Ms. Harrison, one of a handful of neighbors who would speak on the record. “How can you have an 11-year-old child missing down in the Quarters?”

McClelland / Mother Jones:

This is the point at which, as the writer’s editor, I would send him an email. “Dear James,” it would say. “Thanks for getting in this in! I have some concerns that we’ve only got quotes from people who are worried about the suspects (‘The arrests have left many wondering who will be taken into custody next’) and think the girl was asking for it, especially since, even if she actually begged for it, the fact that she is 11 makes the incident stupendously reprehensible (not to mention still illegal). We don’t want anyone wrongly thinking you are being lazy or thoughtless or misogynistic! Please advise if literally no other kinds of quotes are available because every single person who lives in Cleveland, Texas, is a monster.”

Read the whole thing.



Sec. of State Hillary Clinton: Al Jazeera is real news — American news is not particularly informative

“In fact viewership of al Jazeera is going up in the United States because it’s real news. You may not agree with it, but you feel like you’re getting real news around the clock instead of a million commercials and, you know, arguments between talking heads and the kind of stuff that we do on our news which, you know, is not particularly informative to us, let alone foreigners.”

Sec. of State Hillary Clinton: Al Jazeera is ‘Real News’, U.S. Losing ‘Information War’

When a journalist becomes the military’s PR

CBS News Chief Foreign Correspondent Lara Logan on Michael Hastings’ Rolling Stone article on McChrystal: “To be fair to the military, if they believe that a piece is balanced, they will let you back.” Or this: “Michael Hastings has never served his country the way McChrystal has.”

Howard Kurtz asked Logan if there is an “unspoken agreement that you’re not going to embarrass [the troops] by reporting insults and banter.”

“Absolutely,” she said. “Yes… there is an element of trust.”

Geoffrey Dunn:

What Logan is saying–in the shameful code of embedded journalism–is that she and her former colleagues in Afghanistan have been systemically engaged in a journalistic cover-up in their reporting on the longest war in U.S. history, one in which more than 30,000 human lives have been lost, including more than 1,000 Americans and an untold number of Afghani civilians.

…Logan also asserted that Hastings–“if you believe him–says that there were no ground rules laid out. And, I mean, that just doesn’t really make a lot of sense to me.” The “ground rules,” as Andrew Sullivan assessed, are the quid pro quo of trading access for journalistic protection.

And then Logan said something that would be downright laughable if it weren’t so reflective of a thoroughly corrupt mindset. “To be fair to the military,” she said–apparently oblivious to the dirty little secret she was about to reveal– “if they believe that a piece is balanced, they will let you back.

By the way, Logan is now married to a military contractor. Conflict of interest much?

Matt Taibbi:

When I first heard her say that, I thought to myself, “That has to be a joke. It’s sarcasm, right?” But then I went back and replayed the clip – no sarcasm! She meant it! If I’m hearing Logan correctly, what Hastings is supposed to have done in that situation is interrupt these drunken assholes and say, “Excuse me, fellas, I know we’re all having fun and all, but you’re saying things that may not be in your best interest! As a reporter, it is my duty to inform you that you may end up looking like insubordinate douche bags in front of two million Rolling Stone readers if you don’t shut your mouths this very instant!” I mean, where did Logan go to journalism school – the Burson-Marsteller agency?
…instead of cheering this as a great break for our profession, a waytago moment, one so-called reputable journalist after another lines up to protest the leak and attack the reporter for doing his job. God, do you all suck!

Glenn Greenwald:

[T]hose who view their role as exposing the relevant secrets of the powerful (Hastings) and those who view their role as protecting those secrets and serving the interests of those officials (Logan). Amazingly, Logan sounds like the most devoted member of McChyrstal’s P.R. staff or even his family…