So when did the GOP decide it wanted in on the mission to get Osama bin Laden in Pakistan?

Only after it worked — and NOW they want credit.

Up until it actually worked and they saw the public approved, they called going into Pakistan to get OBL ‘crazy’ and ‘frightening.‘ The Republicans and the Fox “News” propaganda machine were fully against it before they were for it.

Even GWB wanted no part of it, saying in September 2006 (probably a year after bin Laden started living in Pakistan): “This thing about . . . let’s put 100,000 of our special forces stomping through Pakistan in order to find bin Laden is just simply not the strategy that will work.”

But this is something President Obama campaigned on and promised to do:

Bin Laden Mission: a very brief summary of Bush’s pursuit vs. Obama’s pursuit

This is a shorter summary of the post below:

  • 2005: Abbottabad compound built — probably when Bin Laden took up residence there.
  • September 2006: Emphasis on bin Laden doesn’t fit with the administration’s strategy for combating terrorism. Here’s how President Bush explained this Tuesday: “This thing about . . . let’s put 100,000 of our special forces stomping through Pakistan in order to find bin Laden is just simply not the strategy that will work.”
  • September 2010: the CIA presented Obama with a set of assessments that indicated bin Laden could be hiding in a compound in northwest Pakistan. Starting in mid-March, the president convened at least nine National Security Council meetings to discuss the intelligence suggesting that bin Laden was possibly hiding out virtually in plain sight.
  • April 29, 2011: After many National Security Council meetings and reviewing the intelligence, Obama gave the order to pursue Bin Laden.
  • May 01, 2011: A small SEAL team begins and ends the strike within 40 minutes — and they take custody of OBL’s body.

So…100,000 special forces “stomping through Pakistan” wasn’t really what was needed. At all. We’ll probably never know if Bush was made aware of Bin Laden’s location in Pakistan and whether he chose not to pursue it further. And if Bush didn’t know, then what “intel” was supposedly used in this mission from Team Bush?

See more details of Bush years.

http://cdn1.newsone.com/files/2009/12/obamabush.jpg

The Osama Bin Laden Operation: Credit Where Credit’s Due

The Bin Laden operation in Abbottabad has been in planning since 2010: the compound caught the attention of intelligence because it had no internet or cell phone signal, which would be unusual for the size and wealth of the place.

In September 2010, the CIA presented Obama with a set of assessments that indicated bin Laden could be hiding in a compound in northwest Pakistan. Starting in mid-March, the president convened at least nine National Security Council meetings to discuss the intelligence suggesting that bin Laden was possibly hiding out virtually in plain sight.

You might find it interesting, because I do, that Osama has probably been in this location in Pakistan since 2005, when the compound was built. So last Friday, Obama gave the order to pursue Bin Laden. In the early hours of Sunday morning, the strike began.

Now take a look at George W. Bush’s pursuit of Bin Laden. From the article “Obama Succeeded Where Bush Failed: Osama Bin Laden Rhetoric And Reality” by Dan Froomkin:

  • BUSH RANCH (AUGUST/2001): The unsuccessful attempts to engage Bush culminated in a briefing he got while vacationing on his Texas ranch. As investigative reporter Ron Suskind reported in his book, “The One Percent Doctrine,” an unnamed CIA operative flew to Crawford to call the president’s attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S. “All right,” Suskind reported Bush saying after hearing out the operative. “You’ve covered your ass, now.”
  • TORA BORA (DEC/2001): After the invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban government quickly fell and al Qaeda retreated into the hills. But in December 2001, when bin Laden was unquestionably within reach of U.S. troops in the mountains of Tora Bora, Bush didn’t pull the trigger.
  • (2001 – 2004): Then for more than three years, Bush treated bin Laden a lot like the wizards in the Harry Potter books treat He Who Must Not Be Named (Dan Froomkin | WaPo): Since the beginning of 2003, in fact, Bush has mentioned bin Laden’s name on only 10 occasions. And on six of those occasions it was because he was asked a direct question. In addition, there were four times when Bush was asked about bin Laden directly but was able to answer without mentioning bin Laden’s name himself. Not once during that period has he talked about bin Laden at any length, or said anything substantive. During the same period, for comparison purposes, Bush has mentioned former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein on approximately 300 occasions.
  • (SUMMER/2005): Bush started invoking bin Laden again — but this time, to win support for his Iraq policy, which was very much on the ropes. “Hear the words of Osama bin Laden,” Bush said, “‘This Third World War is raging’ in Iraq.”
  • (2006): on the stump for his fellow Republicans, Bush was citing bin Laden extensively. The president cast bin Laden as the oracular leader of a global movement, and warned of the possibility of an Islamic caliphate “stretching from Europe to North Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia” — an unsubstantiated fantasy with only one thing going for it: It served the political agendas of both men. Meanwhile, in an Oval Office session that same month, Bush told to a group of conservative columnists that focusing on bin Laden didn’t fit with his military plans. Putting “100,000 of our special forces stomping through Pakistan in order to find bin Laden is just simply not the strategy that will work,” he explained.
  • (POST ELECTION/2008): Yet, in his attempts to persuade the voting public of the dangers it faced, Bush gave bin Laden exactly the attention he seemed to crave. After the 2008 presidential election, during which politicians from both parties publicly renounced him, Bush finally admitted some regret in an ABC News interview. “Do I wish we had brought Osama bin Laden to justice? Sure,” Bush said. “But he’s not leading a lot of parades these days.”

Read the whole thing.

How the world views the Tea Party: The Horror and the Pity

“Thanks to outsized personalities like Sarah Palin and Christine O’Donnell — as well as recent controversies over immigration and Islam — this year’s midterm elections have attracted more international attention than usual. But as this survey of the foreign press shows, each country seems to have its own unique take on America’s anti-incumbent movement.”

The Horror, The Horror… and the Pity: How the international media is covering the Tea Party.

- Not surprisingly, like a majority of Americans, the media in other countries describe the Tea partiers as … insane in so many words: bigoted, Quran-burning extremists, polarizing, an embarrassment and threat to the U.S., angry conspiracy-theorists, and the “Party of No” are just some of the descriptions that have been used internationally.

But the best description comes from an Argentinian correspondent who was dispatched to cover Palin-approved, Tea Party endorsed Christine O’Donnell. The correspondent wanted to “figure out how someone who is “uneducated, unemployed, having a history of tax evasion, who used to practice witchcraft when she was young, who militantly fought masturbation, and who now defends creationism, could unseat the incumbent Republican.

And, maybe also not a big surprise, Germany seems to be fully on-board with the Tea Party and Herr Beck.

Morning in the bunker (Friday the 13th edition)

null

Politics:

  • NEWT [GINGRICH] is so pro-marriage, he can’t stop doing it. ~ Stephen Colbert

News:

Misc:

Song of the day:

Big Picture (Boston.com) — Pakistan Floods

See all photos here

A boy hangs on to the front of a cargo truck while passing through a flooded road in Risalpur, located in Nowshera District in Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province July 30, 2010. (REUTERS/Adrees Latif)

.

People wait to cross a flooded road in Bannu, northwestern Pakistan on Tuesday, Aug. 3, 2010. (AP Photo/Ijaz Mohammad)

Morning in the bunker

null

.

FLOTSAM

  • (Prison Planet / Alex Jones) — Establishment Media Pushes Brain Eating Vaccines “that virtually lobotomize people and rewire their minds into a state of subservient compliance so that their natural instinct to get angry and rebel against the tyranny being imposed upon them is neutered and sterilized.”
  • Behold: a Goblin Shark!  (Video) It has a long pointy head and a jaw that retracts out to bite and back into its face.

x

NEWS:

  • Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked a federal judge Friday to allow same-sex marriages while an appeal over the struck-down law that banned them makes its way through the courts.
  • Pakistani officials say at least 13 million people have been affected by floodwaters that have ravaged the northwest and now are sweeping southward, forcing thousands more to flee their homes.

x

POLITICS:

  • The New York Post accused President Obama of implicitly apologizing for the Hiroshima bombing by sending the U.S. ambassador to Japan to an event memorializing the world’s first atomic bomb attack. But by this standard, President Ronald Reagan apologized to the SS when he laid a wreath at a cemetery in Bitburg, Germany, where SS members were buried.
  • House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) can’t name a single thing he would do to reduce the deficit. He does admit that extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest two percent of Americans will “dig the hole deeper” when it comes to the deficit.

x

Afternoon in the bunker

null
.

  • What’s wrong with the Democratic Party? Voters like Ed Schultz. I guess he couldn’t have been too upset about how the 2000 election turned out. Or as John Cole says, “he certainly wouldn’t have the brass balls to bitch about the Republican House and Senate after sitting out the election and advocating others do the same, would he?”
  • The death toll from flooding in Pakistan has risen to at least 800